...
Let's look at the example of routing information redistribution from RIP to OSPF using scheme described in the main document (Figure (рис. Figure 2).
Center |
---|
Figure 2 - Scheme of the routes redistribution from RIP to OSPF |
...
Command output analyzing
Routing table
Description | Analyze the routing table on each device. The routing tables of BS1 and BS2 are synchronized and contain entries that each device has information about each subnet shown in the scheme. This means that routes redistribution from RIP to OSPF were made successfully. The CPE3 routing table consists of routes to directly connected networks and a default route. This confirms the statement about the unidirectional redistribution. |
---|
BS1 | Code Block |
---|
| BS_1#1> netstat -r
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
10.10.10.0/24 link#2 UC 0 0 eth0
10.10.30.0/24 10.10.10.2 UG3 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 35 lo0
172.16.1.0/29 link#3 UC 0 0 rf5.0
172.16.2.0/29 10.10.10.2 UG3 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.0.2 10.10.10.2 UGH3 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.3 10.10.10.2 UGH3 0 0 eth0
224.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.1 UGS 1 862 lo |
|
---|
BS2 | Code Block |
---|
| BS_2#1> netstat -r
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
10.10.10.0/24 link#2 UC 0 0 eth0
10.10.30.0/24 172.16.2.3 UG3 0 0 rf5.0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 5 60 lo0
172.16.1.0/29 10.10.10.1 UG3 0 0 eth0
172.16.2.0/29 link#3 UC 0 0 rf5.0
192.168.0.1 10.10.10.1 UGH3 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.2 192.168.0.2 UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.0.3 172.16.2.3 UGH3 0 0 rf5.0
224.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.1 UGS 1 462 lo |
|
---|
CPE3 | Code Block |
---|
| AS_3#1> netstat -r
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
10.10.30.0/24 link#2 UC 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 60 lo0
172.16.2.0/29 link#3 UC 0 0 rf5.0
192.168.0.3 192.168.0.3 UH 0 0 lo0
224.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.1 UGS 0 91 lo |
|
---|
Additional materials
Webinars
...